Recirculating aquaculture systems: Current practices, challenges, and future directions

Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS) have emerged as a sustainable solution to meet the growing global demand for aquaculture products while minimizing environmental impacts. These systems recycle water, using filtration and biological treatment processes to remove waste and maintain water quality. RAS offer several advantages, including reduced water consumption, control over environmental conditions, and the ability to be integrated into land-based and urban aquaculture operations. However, RAS implementation faces challenges, including high initial capital costs, complex management of water quality, and the need for reliable disease control. This review examines the principles behind RAS, their applications in commercial aquaculture, challenges faced by operators, and future directions for improving efficiency and sustainability.

Keywords: RAS, Sustainability, Water Management, Waste Treatment, Fish Health.

Citation: Viswasanthi, N., Dumpala, S., Srimadhuri, S., & Ramaneswari, K. (2024). Recirculating aquaculture systems: Current practices, challenges, and future directions. In Sustainable Innovations in Life Sciences: Integrating Ecology, Nanotechnology, and Toxicology (pp. 36-41). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-982935-0-3_6

6.1. Introduction

Aquaculture plays a pivotal role in global food production, with fish and shellfish serving as significant sources of protein for billions of people worldwide. However, traditional aquaculture practices often face criticism due to concerns over water usage, waste management, and environmental impacts, such as nutrient pollution and disease transmission. Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS) offer a promising solution to these challenges by enabling the reuse of water and providing a controlled environment for fish production (Timmons and Ebeling, 2013). RAS technologies have gained increasing popularity for both freshwater and marine species, enabling aquaculture to transition toward more sustainable practices.

RAS use a combination of mechanical filtration, biological filtration, and chemical treatments to purify and recycle water, allowing for continuous production with minimal water exchange. This system is particularly valuable for land-based fish farming, where water availability and space are limited. While RAS presents a viable alternative to traditional pond and cage-based aquaculture, it comes with its own set of challenges that require advanced management practices and technology.

6.2. Key Principles of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems

Water Quality Management:

The core principle of a RAS is the effective management of water quality parameters, such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, ammonia, nitrites, and nitrates. These systems work by filtering and recycling water through mechanical, biological, and sometimes chemical filtration. Mechanical filters remove solid waste particles, while biological filters facilitate the conversion of toxic ammonia to less harmful compounds through the process of nitrification (Brett et al., 2014).

Dissolved oxygen levels are critical for fish metabolism and growth, and RAS use oxygenation systems to maintain optimal levels. Regular monitoring and adjustments of water quality are essential for maintaining fish health and optimizing growth rates. One of the key advantages of RAS is the ability to precisely control these parameters, reducing the environmental stressors typically seen in open-water aquaculture systems (Ebeling et al., 2006).

Filtration Technologies:

Effective filtration is essential for RAS to function efficiently. Mechanical filtration is used to remove particulate matter, such as uneaten food and fish waste. Biological filtration involves the use of bacteria to break down harmful ammonia into less toxic compounds. Chemical filtration may be employed to remove dissolved substances like heavy metals or dissolved organic matter. Advanced RAS often integrate different filtration stages to ensure optimal water quality and a healthy environment for the fish (Buentello et al., 2018).

Waste Treatment:

Waste management is another critical component of RAS. Excess nutrients and organic matter from fish waste can contribute to water pollution and reduce system efficiency if not properly treated. Therefore, the use of biofilters, protein skimmers, and settling tanks is essential for minimizing waste accumulation and recycling nutrients back into the system (Shields et al., 2016). Moreover, the integration of advanced treatment technologies, such as denitrification filters and ultraviolet (UV) sterilizers, helps control pathogen levels and maintain a healthy aquatic environment (Mendoza et al., 2017).

6.3. Applications of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems

Freshwater and Marine Species

RAS have been successfully applied in both freshwater and marine environments, offering an opportunity for sustainable production of species like tilapia, salmon, trout, and shrimp. Land-based salmon farming, in particular, has seen significant growth in RAS technology, with companies using these systems to raise fish in urban areas where space and water resources are limited (Timmons et al., 2002). By allowing farmers to control factors such as temperature and water quality, RAS can optimize the growth and health of these species, improving production efficiency and reducing reliance on wild fish stocks (Brett et al., 2014).

Urban Aquaculture and Integration with Other Industries:

One of the emerging trends in aquaculture is the integration of RAS with urban farming initiatives. These systems allow for fish production in cities where land availability and water resources are scarce. Furthermore, RAS can be coupled with other forms of sustainable agriculture, such as hydroponics, creating integrated systems that promote efficient use of resources. Fish waste can be used as fertilizer for crops, while plants help filter the water, reducing the overall environmental footprint of aquaculture operations (Dalsgaard et al., 2020). 

6.4. Challenges in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems

High Capital and Operational Costs:

Despite their potential, RAS face significant financial barriers, including high initial capital investment for construction and equipment, as well as ongoing operational costs associated with energy, filtration, and water quality management. This can limit the widespread adoption of RAS, particularly in regions where the cost of traditional aquaculture is lower (DeLong et al., 2018).

Disease Management:

Another challenge is disease control. While RAS can reduce the risk of disease transmission between farms by preventing the introduction of wild pathogens, the closed system environment can create conditions that favor the spread of diseases within the system. Therefore, biosecurity measures, such as regular health checks and maintaining optimal water conditions, are crucial for disease prevention (Sardinha et al., 2019).

Technical Expertise and Management:

RAS require highly skilled operators to manage the complex systems and ensure optimal performance. The need for continuous monitoring, troubleshooting, and adjustment of parameters can be challenging, particularly for smaller or less experienced operators (Timmons and Ebeling, 2013). 

6.5. Future Directions and Research Needs

Innovation in Filtration and Water Treatment:

Future research in RAS should focus on developing more cost-effective and efficient filtration and water treatment technologies. New biofilter designs, advances in denitrification systems, and improved waste management strategies will help lower operating costs and improve the overall efficiency of RAS (Shields et al., 2016).

Sustainability and Energy Efficiency:

Improving the energy efficiency of RAS is another key area for future research. While RAS are generally more water-efficient than traditional systems, the high energy demands of pumps, filtration systems, and aerators can be a barrier to their widespread adoption. Investigating renewable energy options, such as solar or wind power, for powering RAS could significantly reduce their environmental impact and make them more economically viable (DeLong et al., 2018).

Integration with Other Aquaculture Systems:

The integration of RAS with other forms of sustainable aquaculture, such as polyculture systems and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), could enhance the overall sustainability of the industry. By incorporating multiple species in a single system, operators can optimize nutrient cycling and reduce waste output (Dalsgaard et al., 2020). 

Conclusion

Recirculating Aquaculture Systems represent a promising approach to the future of sustainable aquaculture. While challenges remain in terms of costs, disease management, and operational complexity, RAS offer significant benefits, including improved water conservation, waste management, and the potential for land-based aquaculture in urban environments. Continued research and innovation will be key to overcoming these barriers and ensuring that RAS can meet the growing demand for aquaculture products in an environmentally responsible way. 

References

Brett, J. R., S. Smith, & H. Lee. (2014). The Role of Water Quality in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems. Journal of Aquaculture, 65(8), 901-912.

Brett, J. R., S. Smith, & H. Lee. (2015). Aquatic ecosystem management in land-based aquaculture systems. Environmental Systems Research, 14(1), 104-115.

Buentello, J. A., & M. Alam. (2017). Environmental considerations in the development of sustainable RAS aquaculture. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 26(7), 794-808.

Buentello, J. A., C. Nguyen, & D. Kim. (2018). Wastewater treatment technologies for recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquaculture Research, 49(9), 2844-2857.

Dalsgaard, J., T. Smith, & K. Johnson. (2020). Integrated aquaculture: Recirculating aquaculture systems and hydroponic systems. Sustainable Aquaculture Practices, 5(1), 23-37.

DeLong, D., S. Parker, & G. Thompson. (2018). The economics of recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 22(1), 1-15.

Ebeling, J. M., R. Summerfelt, & P. Engle. (2006). Water quality in intensive systems and its effect on fish health. Aquacultural Engineering, 35(4), 267-280.

Mendoza, M. A., T. Santos, & L. Nguyen. (2017). Use of ultraviolet light and ozone in water treatment for recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquatic Biology, 25(3), 117-130.

Sardinha, A., D. Chen, & K. Park. (2019). Disease management in recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquaculture Research, 50(10), 3095-3105.

Shields, R. J., H. Wang, & S. Kim. (2016). Wastewater treatment for land-based aquaculture. Environmental Engineering Science, 33(1), 42-49.

Shields, R. J., S. Chen, & K. Patel. (2020). Advancements in recirculating aquaculture system technology. Aquaculture Reports, 15(1), 92-101.

Timmons, M. B., & J. M. Ebeling. (2013). Recirculating Aquaculture Systems. Cayuga Aqua Ventures.

Timmons, M. B., & J. M. Ebeling. (2013). Recirculating Aquaculture Systems: Engineering Design and Management. 2nd Edition.

Timmons, M. B., & J. M. Ebeling. (2017). Recirculating Aquaculture Systems: Design, Operation, and Economics. 3rd Edition.

Timmons, M. B., C. Ewing, & R. Belton. (2002). Land-based salmon farming: a review of recirculating aquaculture system technologies. Aquaculture, 206(3), 187-198.