Acceptance of ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence in several business sectors: Key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies

Due to transformative potential in operational efficiency, customer engagement, and decision-making, ChatGPT and generative AI have grown rapidly across business sectors. However, adoption requires navigating key factors, overcoming challenges, and creating effective implementation strategies. This study examines the main factors influencing generative AI adoption, such as its ability to streamline operations, improve personalization, and provide valuable insights. These AI-driven models are being used in finance, healthcare, retail, and education to automate tasks, improve customer experience, and innovate products. Despite potential, adoption is hindered by significant challenges. Data privacy, ethics, and regulations impose sector-specific barriers. AI literacy gaps and workforce adaptation continue to affect organizational acceptance. Business implementation strategies to overcome these barriers include prioritizing transparent AI practices, investing in AI upskilling, and encouraging technical-non-technical team collaboration, according to the study.

Keywords: ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, Human, Large Language Model, Acceptance, Business

Citation: Patil, D., Rane, N. L., & Rane, J. (2024). Acceptance of ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence in several business sectors: Key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies. In The Future Impact of ChatGPT on Several Business Sectors (pp. 201-241). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981367-8-7_5 

5.1 Introduction

Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), especially generative models like ChatGPT, have transformed business landscapes, sparking interest in how such technologies can be accepted, implemented, and scaled across industries (AlAfnan et al., 2023; Shihab et al., 2023; Raj et al., 2023). OpenAI's ChatGPT generative language model can generate human-like text responses, automate tasks, and aid decision-making (Arman & Lamiyar, 2023; Chuma & De Oliveira, 2023; Jarco & Sulkowski, 2023). It is used in customer service, finance, healthcare, and education for customer engagement and process optimization (Haleem et al., 2022; Deike, 2024; Nugroho et al., 2023). As businesses experiment with generative AI tools, perceived usefulness, trust, security, and workflow alignment affect adoption. Generative AI is adopted in businesses to improve efficiency, save money, and personalize user experiences. In customer service, generative AI can quickly and accurately answer common questions while freeing up human agents to handle complex issues. Generative AI helps doctors write reports, summarize clinical data, and give patients preliminary information, improving operational efficiency and patient satisfaction. In finance, AI models like ChatGPT generate reports, interpret financial data, and provide customer insights to inform business decisions. These applications demonstrate the versatility of generative AI, but businesses face several obstacles that affect their adoption and use of these technologies.

Data privacy, accuracy, and ethics hinder generative AI adoption despite its benefits (Diantoro et al., 2024; Chakraborty et al., 2023; Javaid et al., 2023). Because generative models are trained on massive datasets, sometimes including sensitive or proprietary information, data privacy concerns arise. As with any AI model, outputs may contain inaccuracies or unintended biases, which can lead to misinformation or unintentional discrimination, especially in trusted fields like healthcare and finance. Transparency and accountability issues complicate the balance between automation and ethical responsibility, raising questions about how to ensure that AI-driven decisions comply with company values and regulations.

Companies must develop robust strategies to promote acceptance and reduce generative AI risks to address these challenges (Diantoro et al., 2024; Chakraborty et al., 2023; Javaid et al., 2023). Clear regulatory compliance, ethical guidelines, and employee AI literacy are common strategies. Businesses worldwide follow regulatory frameworks like the European Union's AI Act to ensure safe and ethical AI use across industries. Generative AI applications must follow ethical guidelines to avoid bias and data integrity issues. To use generative AI effectively, employees must understand its limitations and potential. Training and upskilling build trust and empower employees to identify and resolve AI issues, facilitating smoother integration and higher acceptance of these technologies within organizational frameworks. Integrating generative AI like ChatGPT into business workflows and processes shapes its acceptance (Rane, 2023; Cribben & Zeinali, 2023; Jusman et al., 2023). AI-driven processes must be seamlessly integrated into existing workflows to boost productivity. Technical teams and business units must collaborate to create AI solutions that solve industry-specific problems. Businesses should iteratively refine AI processes based on real-world feedback to maximize its potential. Iteratively improving AI outputs improves performance and builds trust and acceptance among employees and stakeholders (Harahap et al., 2023; Huang & Xing, 2023; Chu, 2023). To maximize the benefits of generative AI, businesses must understand the factors that help or hinder its adoption. This research analyzes ChatGPT and similar AI technologies' acceptance in various business sectors, focusing on key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies to fill the gap. By examining industry acceptance of generative AI, this study seeks to advance knowledge through a comprehensive literature review and empirical analysis.

Contributions of this Research

• Reviewing the literature on ChatGPT and generative AI acceptance, including key factors, challenges, and successes.
• Identifying AI acceptance themes across sectors using co-occurrence and keyword analysis.
• Clustering implementation strategies and acceptance factors across business sectors.

5.2 Co-occurrence and cluster analysis of the keywords

Fig. 5.1 shows the co-occurrence and cluster analysis of the keywords in the literature.  This network diagram shows a complex web of keywords related to ChatGPT and generative AI adoption across domains. The diagram shows how these keywords co-occur and cluster, revealing several major thematic areas that affect ChatGPT and AI integration and use in business. Each cluster describes how AI tools like ChatGPT are perceived, implemented, and evaluated in business and education, with implications for social and psychological AI use. This diagram clusters keywords by association, with different colors indicating thematic areas. The size of nodes, which represent keywords, indicates the importance of specific concepts in each thematic area. Thicker lines (edges) indicate a stronger association between two keywords, with thicker lines indicating more co-occurrence in the same context. These visuals show the structure of ChatGPT and generative AI acceptance discussions and the complex factors involved in their implementation across sectors. This network revolves around "ChatGPT," "artificial intelligence," "students," and "technology acceptance." These terms indicate their importance in AI adoption discussions. The term "ChatGPT" is associated with "artificial intelligence" and "large language models," reflecting its core role as an AI-capable language model. The core includes "students" and "higher education" to emphasize educational perspectives in AI discussions. This centrality emphasizes how generative AI tools are both technological innovations and educational resources and learning aids, especially in higher education, where pedagogical and practical applications are highly sought.

A red cluster on the left of the diagram discusses educational technology adoption. Keywords like "education computing," "engineering education," "perceived usefulness," "intention to use," and "the unified theory of acceptance" indicate academic interest in AI adoption drivers. These terms describe the use of theoretical models like the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to study student and educator technology adoption. This cluster includes keywords like "academic integrity" and "social influence" suggesting ethical considerations and peer influence in AI tool adoption in education. "Social influence" may refer to how peers and educators' AI perceptions affect ChatGPT attitudes and intentions. Students may use AI tools to generate assignments or help with coursework, raising questions about originality and ethics. "Academic integrity" addresses these issues.

Fig. 5.1 Co-occurrence analysis of the trending keywords

On the right side of the diagram, a green cluster highlights human factors, psychology, and AI healthcare applications. The words "humans," "health care," "perception," "privacy," "trust," and "acceptance" emphasize the personal and societal effects of AI adoption. This cluster addresses privacy and trust issues, which are crucial to AI adoption, especially in sensitive fields like healthcare. The terms "survey," "attitude," "questionnaire," and "perception" suggest that empirical research methods are used to assess public and professional attitudes toward AI applications. Surveys may examine how healthcare providers and patients view ChatGPT's potential to aid clinical decision-making and data privacy concerns when using AI in patient care. The keyword "trust" emphasizes the importance of trust-building in AI acceptance, as people are more likely to use AI tools they perceive as reliable, accurate, and ethical.

A blue cluster of decision-making, machine learning, and NLP keywords rises above the core. ChatGPT and related generative AI models' technical capabilities include "decision making," "natural language processing," "learning systems," "machine learning," and "artificial intelligence tools". This technological cluster emphasizes how AI tools aid decision-making and automate language-based tasks using machine learning and NLP. For example, "natural language processing" and "learning systems" emphasize AI's ability to understand and generate human-like text for customer service, content generation, and more. This cluster includes "decision making" because ChatGPT's language generation capabilities are used for strategic or operational decisions as well as communication, which can be useful in business contexts where quick, data-informed decisions are needed.

The diagram's periphery includes keywords like "major clinical study," "controlled study," "likert scale," and "psychology" that emphasize empirical research and evaluation. These terms describe structured AI impact assessments, especially in clinical or psychological research. The term "likert scale" refers to surveys that use quantitative scales to assess AI attitudes like satisfaction, ease of use, and perceived value. Similarly, "psychology" emphasizes cognitive and behavioral responses to AI, suggesting that researchers are studying both its functional and psychological effects on users. This emphasis on empirical methods requires a rigorous approach to assessing AI's efficacy and user acceptance in various contexts, from healthcare-controlled experiments to consumer market attitudinal studies.

Fig. 5.2 shows factors, challenges, and implementation strategies that drive AI adoption in retail, healthcare, financial services, and manufacturing. This intricate layout highlights important factors influencing the adoption of AI-driven technologies like ChatGPT, including sector-specific benefits, barriers, and strategies. First, automation benefits, customer personalization, cost reduction, and operational efficiency show why these industries are adopting generative AI. Depending on industry relevance and impact, each factor is linked to sectors. Automation benefits retail, healthcare, financial services, and manufacturing by enabling cost-effective task automation, boosting productivity, and supporting workforce tasks like customer service and routine inquiries. Retail and financial services depend on customer personalization, which ChatGPT improves through targeted marketing, tailored recommendations, and personalised financial advice, building customer loyalty. Manufacturing, driven by back-end automation, prioritizes customer personalization less than healthcare to improve patient engagement and information delivery.

Fig. 5.2 Acceptance of generative AI in various business sectors

Cost reduction, another key driver, affects sectors that need efficiency and budget allocation improvements. ChatGPT and AI automated labor-intensive manufacturing processes, reducing errors and downtime. ChatGPT's rapid data processing speeds up cost-effective solutions in financial services and retail, where streamlined customer support and inventory management boost financial resilience. Generative AI helps complex industries like financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing improve operational efficiency. ChatGPT automates customer interactions, improves analytics, and boosts productivity without compromising quality for financial services. Healthcare emphasizes administrative simplification, fast patient inquiries, and efficient data handling, while manufacturing uses AI for process optimization and quality control to reduce operational bottlenecks and production delays.

However, widespread AI adoption is difficult. Data privacy is important in healthcare and financial services, which handle sensitive data. HIPAA requires healthcare providers to protect patient data, while data protection laws limit financial services' access to customer data. Retail and manufacturing have lower-level privacy concerns, focusing on customer information rather than data compliance. Another barrier to AI adoption, especially in healthcare and retail, is technical inexperience. Since healthcare relies on specialized skills, it often lacks in-house AI expertise, making ChatGPT integration difficult. Despite becoming more familiar with digital tools, retailers may struggle with generative AI technologies due to their rapid evolution and staff training requirements. Manufacturing has moderate challenges since it uses automation tools, but generative AI's complexity requires workforce adaptation.

Cost is another issue, especially in retail, healthcare, and manufacturing, where AI setup, infrastructure, and maintenance can be expensive. Secure, compliant systems in healthcare and scalable solutions in manufacturing increase financial barriers, while customer-facing AI applications and backend logistics integration in retail cost money. Structured implementation strategies to ease AI acceptance are needed to address these issues. Training and development are crucial in retail, healthcare, and finance. Retailers need staff to manage, troubleshoot, and optimize customer-focused AI applications, while healthcare workers need specialized training to use ChatGPT for patient care and administrative tasks. Continuous training ensures safe, effective AI deployment in financial services, which require customer engagement and data management.

Healthcare and financial services prioritize data protection, so ChatGPT must comply with data encryption, secure servers, and regulatory standards. Retail, which handles less sensitive data than healthcare or finance, still needs secure data handling to maintain customer trust. Healthcare, retail, and financial services need strategic partnerships with technology providers for resources, expertise, and infrastructure. These partnerships simplify AI integration and provide cutting-edge technology without high internal investment. Healthcare providers may work with AI firms to use clinical-specific tools, while financial institutions may work together to secure data.

Customized solutions allow each industry to adapt ChatGPT's functions to its unique operational needs, easing AI acceptance. In financial services, customized AI tools manage complex data processing and customer relationships, while healthcare needs AI solutions for patient engagement, diagnostics, and compliance. Retail customizes ChatGPT's consumer-facing apps for targeted interactions, while manufacturing streamlines processes, quality checks, and production forecasting. These strategies work together to overcome adoption challenges and maximize ChatGPT and generative AI's benefits across industries.

5.3 Factors influencing acceptance of ChatGPT and generative AI in several business sectors

Fig. 5.3 shows the ChatGPT adoption in business. In various business sectors, technological, organizational, and societal factors affect ChatGPT and generative AI adoption (Biswas, 2023; Kalla et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2023; Rane et al., 2024b; Rane et al., 2024c). This adoption is driven by AI's unmatched value in customer engagement, operational efficiency, and revenue generation (Yu, 2023; Sharma & Yadav, 2022; Liu et al., 2023). Business leaders across industries are more eager than ever to adopt AI tools. Sector acceptance rates vary by technology readiness, employee and customer attitudes, regulatory landscapes, and perceived risks (Kocoń et al., 2023; Roumeliotis & Tselikas, 2023; Rahman & Watanobe, 2023).

Tech and infrastructure readiness

AI maturity and business digital infrastructure affect adoption. Manufacturing and agriculture are less ready to adopt ChatGPT and generative AI than finance and technology. High-speed data processing, cloud services, and data storage help companies adopt AI. Generational AI is more likely to improve customer experiences and operational efficiency in digitally transformed industries like retail and e-commerce. Personalization, inventory, and customer service can benefit from generative AI. In sectors with limited digital infrastructure, AI adoption may require initial investments to reap its benefits.

Worker Skill

Access to AI-savvy professionals also affects acceptance. To adopt generative AI, companies need staff who understand AI and business applications. In finance and technology, where data scientists, machine learning engineers, and software developers are abundant, generative AI adoption may be easier. AI adoption may be slower in healthcare and education, where expertise is scarce. Training and upskilling can prepare workers for generative AI, but they take time and money, which may deter some companies.

Economic Incentives and Competitive Advantage

Business adoption of generative AI is driven by profit and competitiveness. Companies that see AI's potential to optimize processes, cut costs, and increase revenue are more likely to adopt it. Automating customer service and support responses with ChatGPT reduces labor costs and response times. Generative AI helps retail and telecommunications companies improve customer experiences, personalize services, and respond faster to market demands. These companies can gain market share and innovation with generative AI, which can boost adoption. However, AI solutions' high initial costs may deter companies that cannot justify the investment.

Public and client perception

AI acceptance depends on customer and public opinion. Finance and healthcare, where customer trust is crucial, are sensitive to AI adoption, especially privacy and data security. ChatGPT and other AI technologies use sensitive data to gain insights, raising data protection and misuse concerns. Thus, customer acceptance depends on companies' ethical AI use and data security assurances. Demographic and regional differences in AI awareness and comfort can also affect adoption rates. Businesses that effectively communicate AI benefits and safeguards increase customer acceptance and generative AI technology adoption.

Rules and Compliance

Compliance with evolving AI usage regulations can significantly impact sector adoption. Financial and healthcare sectors have strict data usage, security, and privacy rules. Companies in these sectors must navigate complex regulations before using AI solutions like ChatGPT for data-driven decision-making or customer interactions. Regulations like GDPR and HIPAA require companies to protect data and disclose AI use. However, less-regulated industries like entertainment and marketing may adopt generative AI technologies more easily. Depending on how restrictive or enabling, regional and sector regulations can accelerate or slow AI adoption.

Ethics and Risks

Generative AI has many benefits, but ethical and risk concerns may prevent its adoption. Businesses must address ethical issues like AI misuse, such as misleading content, data manipulation, and biased decisions. ChatGPT in content creation or marketing may raise questions about originality and authenticity, which could damage brand reputation if not managed transparently. AI-generated insights must be accurate and fair in legal and healthcare, where decisions have major consequences. These companies may be wary of generative AI due to liability or reputational risk from unethical or biased outputs. Enterprises are prioritizing ethical AI frameworks, transparency, and accountability to address these concerns, which may slow adoption.

Company culture and employee resistance

Company culture and employee attitudes affect tech adoption. Employees may resist generative AI like ChatGPT because they fear job loss or a change in traditional practices. Resistance to change may slow generative AI adoption in manufacturing and education. IT and digital marketing are more innovative and may face less resistance. Leadership promotes AI by emphasizing its productivity and reduction of repetitive tasks. Training and change management reduce employee resistance to generative AI, simplifying workflow integration.

Business Examples and Uses

Also consider whether generative AI has clear, practical applications in a sector. Retail customer support and media content creation are more likely to adopt ChatGPT and other AI technologies due to their clear benefits. In legal document review and contract generation, generative AI speeds up workflows and cuts costs. Businesses may be wary of AI technology in sectors with unclear applications or ROI. AI solutions tailored to industry needs and successful case studies can demonstrate value and reduce uncertainty about their efficacy, encouraging adoption.

Changes and Competition

Businesses adopt AI based on industry trends and competition. As more companies adopt ChatGPT and other generative AI solutions, industries expect to compete. Businesses that fall behind risk losing market relevance as customers expect personalized and efficient interactions. Companies in customer-facing industries like banking, retail, and telecommunications must adopt AI to compete. Rapid advances in AI capabilities like natural language understanding, processing speeds, and cloud-based accessibility make AI integration more appealing to more businesses.

Leadership Goals

Leading priorities greatly impact ChatGPT adoption. Innovative leaders invest more in generative AI and promote AI adoption. A company's CEO or board may prioritize AI integration into business processes if they prioritize digital transformation. Leadership encourages experimentation and agility, enabling AI. Generative AI projects may be undersupported by risk-averse or skeptical leadership, slowing their adoption in the company.

Organizational Flexibility

Companies' adoption of generative AI depends on their ability to adopt new technologies quickly. Agile companies value continuous learning, flexible workflows, and rapid experimentation, which helps them integrate generative AI. AI adoption may be difficult in hierarchical organizations with rigid processes and approval hierarchies. AI is adopted faster by adaptable industries like technology and digital marketing than manufacturing and government services. Organizational agility impacts AI adoption and value.

Industry needs and issues

Each industry's needs and challenges determine ChatGPT and generative AI adoption. Accuracy and reliability affect healthcare AI adoption due to life-or-death decisions. AI's diagnostic, patient support, and predictive analysis potential is promising but requires rigorous validation and testing, slowing adoption. Low-risk AI features like personalized recommendations are widely used in retail to improve customer experience. Finance and legal fear AI-driven recommendations will damage their reputations and finances. Therefore, industry-specific risk factors and compliance requirements can accelerate or slow AI adoption.

Fig. 5.3 ChatGPT adoption in business

Cost-benefit analysis and startup

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT are expensive, which can hinder adoption. Businesses calculate ROI before adopting AI technologies. AI's long-term benefits—automation, efficiency, and customer satisfaction—are appealing, but its high setup and operational costs may deter smaller or low-profit companies. Integrating AI into legacy systems, training staff, and building data infrastructure cost money. Companies must weigh these costs against potential gains, which vary by sector and affect acceptance.

Data quality, availability

Generative AI models need good data. Data availability, accessibility, and quality affect sector AI success and acceptance. Generational AI is easier to use for insights and predictive modeling in e-commerce and finance, which generate and manage massive customer and transactional data. With less structured data, agriculture and traditional manufacturing may struggle to extract value from AI, slowing adoption. AI models need accurate data to produce meaningful and actionable outputs, so data accuracy, bias elimination, and data governance policies affect AI acceptance.

Public AI Trust and Transparency

Public trust affects AI adoption in banking, healthcare, and retail. Trust in AI-driven insights and decisions grows with transparency. If customers don't understand how AI determines creditworthiness, they may distrust AI-generated decisions, hurting a bank's reputation and adoption of such tools. Trust is built through transparency, AI's role, and AI model biases and limitations. Companies that prioritize ethical AI, data privacy, and explainability are more likely to gain internal and external acceptance because transparency reduces AI reliability and fairness concerns.

Regional and cultural differences

Cultural and regional differences affect AI acceptance because technology attitudes vary by country. North American and Asian tech companies are more open to generative AI experiments and adopt AI faster. AI adoption is slower in regions with young digital infrastructure or high skepticism. Privacy, security, and AI decision-making are culturally shaped. Regional differences can affect how quickly global organizations, especially those with diverse international operations, adopt generative AI technologies.

Privacy and Cybersecurity

Generative AI models process and learn from large amounts of data, raising data privacy concerns. AI misuse and data breaches worry finance, healthcare, and retail companies that handle sensitive personal data. Use of ChatGPT for customer service requires careful data handling to prevent unauthorized access and comply with data privacy laws. Companies are boosting cybersecurity, encryption, and data anonymization to address these issues. Costs and challenges of implementing these protections may lower acceptance rates in data privacy-sensitive industries.

AI-Human Collaboration Potential

In some sectors, human-AI collaboration affects generative AI acceptance. Generative AI is increasingly seen as a human enhancement. Creatives can focus on strategy by using AI tools to generate or refine content and design ideas. Doctors use AI to diagnose and analyze patient data, but they make decisions. Businesses adopt AI because it complements human expertise and works collaboratively. Sectors that prioritize human-AI collaboration accept generated AI because it meets operational goals and boosts productivity without sacrificing jobs. Effective change management and employee training are crucial for integrating and accepting generative AI. Employees must understand AI's effects on daily tasks. Skill development and training programs that explain AI's job creation reduce job displacement fears. Effective change management sectors accept AI more. Structured training on AI risk assessment and fraud detection has increased finance employees' confidence and acceptance of generative AI tools.

Sustainability and Social Responsibility issues

AI technologies like generative models raise environmental and social concerns due to energy consumption and job displacement. These concerns affect sustainable business AI adoption because large-scale AI models increase carbon emissions. Companies must responsibly use AI and consider its social impact. Many companies, especially public ones, are considering green AI technologies and renewable data center energy sources to reduce AI's environmental impact. Corporate social responsibility efforts affect AI acceptance. 

5.4 Sustainable ChatGPT and generative AI adoption in several business sectors

Sustainable ChatGPT and generative AI adoption in various business sectors is a growing AI in business theme (Zhong et al., 2023; Gilardi et al., 2023; Shen et al., 2023; Rane et al., 2024a). As generative models improve, businesses are exploring ways to use them to boost productivity, innovation, and customer engagement while being environmentally and ethically responsible (Liu et al., 2023; Yeo et al., 2023; Aydın & Karaarslan, 2023). Sustainable adoption requires integrating advanced AI systems into business processes while minimizing environmental impact, maximizing resource efficiency, and ensuring equity.

Energy Efficiency in AI Operations

Sustainable deployment of ChatGPT and other large language models is difficult due to energy consumption. Large-scale model training requires energy-intensive data centers and computation. Large models can emit as much CO2 as multiple cars over their lifetime, raising environmental concerns. AI investors are becoming more eco-conscious. Tech companies are investigating wind, solar, and hydroelectric data center power. Microsoft, Google, and Amazon are using renewable energy for AI to reduce carbon emissions. AI processors are being made energy-efficient. Sustainable AI goals can be achieved by reducing computational requirements and energy consumption with transfer learning and pruning.

Customer Service Generative AI sustainability

Generative AI can sustain customer service. ChatGPT-based customer interaction solutions reduce agent workload and call center energy costs. ChatGPT chatbots cut wait times and boost customer satisfaction 24/7. Data privacy and trust are needed for sustainable customer service adoption. Businesses use scalable, reusable models that use less data and computational resources while maintaining accuracy to sustain ChatGPT in customer service. Model retraining is reduced because generative AI models are optimized for common customer queries. These methods reduce computational load, saving money and the environment. Companies are considering the lifecycle of customer data used in training and prioritizing privacy and responsible data use to build trust.

Generative Content and Marketing AI

Copywriting, image generation, and social media management by Generative AI are changing marketing and advertising strategies across sectors. The model's ability to generate engaging content without human intervention enables sustainable content creation. These tools help companies mass-produce content, saving time and money. Businesses are reducing content redundancies and over-generation to maintain adoption. Companies reduce output and computational load by using predictive analytics to evaluate content before creating it. A sustainable approach reuses content across channels rather than creating new content. Businesses can streamline content creation and promote sustainable marketing with generative AI and resource-conscious strategies.

Finance: Fraud detection and advice

Financial services use generative AI for fraud detection, personalized advice, and automated customer service. Generative models can detect unusual patterns and behaviors in real time, improving fraud detection. Efficiency boosts financial security and lowers manual monitoring's environmental impact. Finance firms that use ChatGPT use low-energy AI models to improve sustainability. Recent trends use hybrid models with machine learning algorithms and rule-based systems for simple cases and high-computational models for complex cases. Hybridization reduces pollution and detects fraud. Additionally, generative AI-powered sustainable financial advice services are making financial planning more accessible, promoting equitable resource distribution and financial literacy.

Healthcare and Generative AI: Ethics and Sustainability

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT improve diagnostics, patient interaction, and treatment recommendations. AI chatbots help patients find resources and avoid unnecessary doctor visits by providing preliminary health assessments. This method can significantly lower healthcare energy and operational costs. Healthcare AI must prioritize patient privacy, security, and ethics to survive. Healthcare providers are developing federated learning models that let AI learn from data from multiple institutions without centralizing it, reducing data transfer and protecting patient privacy. Diagnostics are more sustainable and computationally efficient when models are trained on smaller datasets with medical expertise. These methods let healthcare providers use AI to improve patient outcomes while reducing environmental and ethical impact.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain: Streamlining

Generative AI models optimize inventory, demand prediction, and logistics in manufacturing and supply chain management. Accurate demand forecasts and inventory reduction reduce waste and environmental impact. AI-driven manufacturing automation reduces energy use and improves efficiency, enabling sustainable supply chains. Sustainable manufacturing requires energy-efficient AI. Predictive maintenance models reduce machine breakdowns and part and machinery purchases. Generative AI simulations before production help manufacturers anticipate and optimize designs, reducing waste from faulty products or inefficient processes. This sustainable method extends machinery life, reduces energy use, and reduces material waste, greening the manufacturing ecosystem.

Ethics and Regulation

Generative AI adoption requires ethical and regulatory compliance. AI systems are being urged to be transparent, protect user privacy, and avoid biases that harm certain groups. Sustainable adoption addresses social and ethical issues as well as environmental ones. Companies must account for their AI deployments under regulations, promoting fair use. The EU's AI Act regulates AI systems, particularly consumer rights and privacy. Sustainable generative AI adoption requires these standards to build trust and accountability. Sustainable AI adoption strategies now monitor AI systems' fairness, transparency, and inclusivity with ethical AI frameworks.

Sustainable Business AI Adoption Future

Businesses will use ChatGPT and other generative AI technologies sustainably to shape AI development and deployment. Edge computing, which reduces energy use by computing AI computations closer to data sources, and carbon-neutral data centers will change how businesses use these technologies sustainably. Growth in lightweight, modular AI models that can operate efficiently with limited resources will allow businesses to deploy generative AI in low-infrastructure environments, improving accessibility and sustainability. Through industry collaboration and sustainability best practices, businesses will find new ways to integrate AI into workflows with minimal environmental impact. Sustainable business growth of generative AI requires eco-friendly infrastructure, data handling, and AI decision-making transparency.

Green AI, Energy-Efficient Algorithms

Research on “green AI,” which creates AI models with lower energy use and environmental impact, is popular. Researchers are creating computationally lighter algorithms without sacrificing performance. AI models are smaller and faster after compression, quantization, and pruning, saving energy and data. Green AI initiatives are also driving the adoption of neuromorphic computing chips and energy-efficient GPUs to optimize AI performance with less power. This hardware should reduce AI's carbon footprint and scale ChatGPT and other generative models across industries.

Federated Learning/Privacy AI

Federation learning is popular for data privacy and computational efficiency. Federation lets AI models learn from decentralized data sources instead of energy-intensive centralization. Distributing model training across devices reduces energy use and protects privacy from centralized data processing. Federated learning researchers are protecting data points and improving models with differential privacy and secure multi-party computation. Federated learning benefits data-sensitive industries like healthcare and finance. This lets companies use generative AI for predictive tasks, fraud detection, and personalized services without compromising user trust or sustainability.

Transparent, ethical AI use with Explainable AI

Hot research topic Explainable AI (XAI) aims to make AI models, including generative models like ChatGPT, more understandable. XAI methods explain AI models' internal decision-making processes so users can understand their results. In finance, healthcare, and law, opaque AI decisions can have major consequences. Ethics in AI adoption drives XAI research as stakeholders demand more transparency in AI systems that affect customer interactions and decisions. Making AI decisions interpretable helps businesses ensure responsible use, build trust, and address biases. To create an energy-efficient, transparent AI model, XAI research provides clear explanations that promote ethical and fair AI applications.

Transfer Learning and Reusable Models for AI Training Efficiency

Transfer learning is important because it lets models be pre-trained on a large dataset and fine-tuned for specific tasks with smaller datasets. Not training large models from scratch saves time, energy, and computational resources. Transfer learning lets businesses use ChatGPT-like generative models for diverse applications with minimal customization. Transfer learning creates reusable and adaptable AI models for sectors with limited computational resources. Develop countries and small businesses with limited budgets can use AI without extensive infrastructure with these reusable models. Transfer learning makes AI adoption inclusive and sustainable by lowering entry barriers and energy consumption.

Low-Resource Sustainable Environmental NLP Models

Low-resource NLP models are in demand as ChatGPT and other NLP applications grow. These models perform well in low-computational, data-, and energy environments. This research makes NLP models accessible and sustainable by training them on smaller datasets and less computational power. Low-resource NLP is needed in emerging markets and SMBs without extensive computational infrastructure. Researchers are making generative AI models leaner and more efficient to enable sustainable AI adoption and help more businesses benefit from AI-powered solutions without high environmental costs.

Decentralized, low-energy edge AI-processing

Edge AI deploys AI models on smartphones, IoT devices, and local servers instead of clouds. Critical as generative AI adoption grows, this reduces data transmission energy and bandwidth. Edge AI enables low-latency real-time AI solutions for retail (customer service chatbots) and manufacturing (predictive maintenance). Edge AI research aims to make lightweight, high-quality generative models like ChatGPT for edge devices. Edge AI helps companies provide fast, reliable AI experiences while reducing their carbon footprint by reducing data center use.

AI-Model Carbon Accounting

Research is being done to accurately measure and report AI models' carbon footprints throughout their lifecycle as awareness of AI's environmental impacts grows. We study standardized frameworks and tools to track model training, deployment, and usage emissions. Carbon accounting provides data on AI models' environmental impact to help businesses choose sustainable practices. Transparent industries like finance and retail are using carbon accounting. To meet sustainability goals, many companies report AI carbon footprints to stakeholders. Transparency allows companies to switch to renewable data center energy or optimize model design, promoting sustainable AI adoption.

Human-AI Collaboration for Sustainable Workflows

Research is also looking at ways to improve human-AI workflow collaboration with generative AI. Companies can reduce AI computational load and increase productivity by optimizing task division. Chatbots handle routine customer service inquiries, freeing agents to handle complex cases. This collaborative approach improves customer satisfaction and reduces AI computation, making it more sustainable. For employees to use AI, human-AI collaboration emphasizes intuitive, user-friendly interfaces. Designing AI systems that work with humans helps businesses balance and sustain AI integration into workflows.

Automation model lifecycle

Research is focusing on autonomous AI model monitoring, maintenance, and updating. Resources are needed to maintain accurate, relevant, and unbiased generative models. Model retraining is reduced by automated lifecycle management tools, saving energy and computation. In fast-changing industries like retail and finance, generative models must be updated to reflect trends and regulations, making this research essential. Model lifecycle management automation helps businesses sustainably adapt generative AI to changing business needs. These systems track model performance and automatically adjust functionality to promote sustainable AI use.

Generative AI Ethics and Bias Reduction

Finally, ethical auditing and bias mitigation research are essential for fair, inclusive, and ethical generative models. Bias mitigation research finds and eliminates AI system biases that could cause discrimination in sensitive fields like healthcare, finance, and hiring. Legal and ethical compliance of AI models is assessed using ethical auditing frameworks. This practise fosters sustainable AI adoption through trust, inclusivity, and accountability. Companies can avoid reputational risks, align with society, and achieve long-term sustainability goals with AI lifecycle ethical auditing.

5.5 Challenges in implementing generative AI in in several business sectors

Fig. 5.1 shows the acceptance of ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence in several business sectors. Generative AI transforms industries and creates new applications. Transitional challenges affect strategic decisions, ethics, and operational efficiency. Generated AI is promising, but it needs careful system integration, regulatory alignment, and workforce transition management. Challenges include data security and privacy, bias, ethical and legal issues, infrastructure costs, and a steep employee and stakeholder learning curve. Understanding these challenges is essential to maximizing AI's potential without compromising responsibility and fairness as industries adopt this new technology.

Data security and privacy issues make generative AI implementation difficult. Generative AI uses healthcare, finance, and retail data. Medical records, financial data, and personal preferences are handled by these industries, which can be dangerous if not handled properly. Generative AI models need massive datasets to learn patterns and produce meaningful outputs, increasing data breaches and misuse. Financial institutions need large transactional data to analyze customer behavior with AI. A major data breach could damage finances and reputation. Businesses must implement strong data governance practices when deploying generative AI solutions due to GDPR and HIPAA restrictions.

Businesses also worry about generative AI model bias. AI algorithms may learn from human biases or social inequalities in historical data. AI models with these biases can discriminate in hiring, loan approval, and law enforcement. Generative AI models trained on biased historical hiring data may favor certain demographics according to gender or race. Legal liability and public image can suffer as companies are criticized for discrimination. Addressing these biases requires costly training data analysis and refinement. AI model fairness and transparency require companies to work hard, complicating generative AI implementation.

Generative AI raises ethical and legal issues for businesses. AI has major ethical implications for content creation, IP, and misinformation. AI-generated deepfake videos raise ethical and authenticity concerns in the media and entertainment industry. Undisclosed AI-generated marketing and advertising content may mislead consumers. Since AI laws are evolving, businesses don't know the legal implications of using generative AI tools. To avoid penalties and reputational damage, businesses must follow legal developments and use AI ethically.

Generative AI implementation costs are another issue for SMEs without the financial resources of larger corporations. Modern generative AI models require a lot of computational power, which raises hardware and software costs. Maintenance and updating these models requires a dedicated team of data scientists, AI engineers, and IT professionals, which can strain budgets. In low-profit industries like manufacturing and logistics, generative AI's upfront and ongoing costs can be prohibitive. Businesses must evaluate their ROI and decide if AI implementation is worth it. Lack of workforce expertise makes generative AI implementation difficult. Due to AI technology's rapid advancement, traditional IT departments may struggle with machine learning and AI model training. Non-tech industries like healthcare and education struggle to hire and retain generative AI experts. Generative AI training for current employees takes time, resources, and may reduce productivity. Many companies struggle to balance training and operations disruption, slowing AI adoption.

Also problematic is generative AI integration into business systems and workflows. Many industry legacy systems may not work with AI, requiring extensive modifications or overhauls. AI integration must be planned to avoid disruption in legacy software and hardware-dominated industries like finance and manufacturing. The incompatibility of generative AI with ERP systems can also slow decision-making and lower productivity. If integrating generative AI with existing infrastructure disrupts business operations, complexity and cost may deter businesses.

Unique AI-generated content ethics and operational issues. AI can create articles, images, and music, raising authorship, originality, and creativity questions. Generative AI can mimic artists' art and music, blurring copyright and intellectual property lines. Who owns AI-generated content—business, developer, or none? Ambiguity can complicate intellectual property management for businesses and cause legal issues. Generative AI integration into content-focused industries is complicated by the risk of lawsuits if AI-generated content violates creative rights.

Social and economic issues arise from generative AI's workforce impact. In repetitive or low-skilled jobs, many fear AI will replace them. In customer service and retail, AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants replace humans. AI-driven automation can increase efficiency and lower costs, but it may replace workers without AI skills. Employee morale and AI adoption are affected. To prepare for an AI-driven future, companies must reskill or upskill employees and encourage continuous learning.

Generative AI output unpredictability: Data patterns instead of rules give generative AI models variable outputs. This can affect precision-intensive industries like healthcare and finance. A generative AI model diagnosing medical conditions may make different recommendations, causing inconsistent patient treatment. AI-driven investment strategies may exceed a client's risk tolerance in finance. AI models are unpredictable, so they must be rigorously tested and validated for accurate, reliable, and organizationally compliant outputs.

Model Transparency and Explainability

Complex generative AI models with opaque decision-making processes create the "black box" problem. Compliance and ethics require transparency in AI-generated decisions in healthcare, finance, and legal. Recent research develops model output explanation methods to make AI systems more interpretable. The new field of "explainable AI" (XAI) seeks to create algorithms that can explain their reasoning. SHAP and LIME are trendy. These methods help stakeholders understand how data features affect model outputs, making AI systems more transparent and boosting trust in AI decisions.

Conclusions

ChatGPT and other generative AI models have transformed multiple business sectors through automation, personalization, and customer engagement in recent years. As the digital age evolves, companies must adopt generative AI tools like ChatGPT to stay competitive. This study examined the adoption of generative AI in various business sectors, its integration challenges, and effective implementation strategies. Our findings show that while businesses are increasingly realizing the potential of generative AI to optimize operations and deliver innovative services, their journey to implementation is often complicated by technological and human-centric factors. ChatGPT and generative AI's ability to boost productivity and lower operational costs drives their adoption in business. Generative AI automates customer support, content creation, and data analysis, allowing employees to focus on higher-order tasks and optimize resource allocation. This is especially useful in customer service, retail, and marketing, where response speed and personalization affect customer satisfaction and loyalty. As more companies realize the cost savings of AI-driven automation, ChatGPT models are being deployed as a strategic move to improve operational efficiency. AI's versatility—from healthcare, where it aids patient consultations and data handling, to finance, where it detects fraud and supports customers-solidifies its status as a valuable business asset.

Generational AI faces data privacy and security issues that hinder its adoption. Many organizations are hesitant to use AI tools due to data handling and regulatory compliance concerns. Generative AI models like ChatGPT need a lot of data, which raises data protection and consumer privacy concerns. Finance and healthcare companies, which handle sensitive data, face stricter regulations, which hinders AI adoption. AI misuse and misinformation have also raised ethical concerns among stakeholders. This ethical aspect complicates acceptance, especially in sectors where brand reputation and consumer trust are crucial, highlighting the need for responsible AI use and improved data governance. Workforce readiness and adaptability also affect generative AI adoption. Employees must adapt to new workflows and learn AI tools to work effectively. ChatGPT and other models reduce human intervention in some processes but require new AI oversight, ethical management, and data interpretation skills. Companies that actively train and educate employees about AI have higher AI acceptance and smoother integration. Employees may view AI as a threat to job security or struggle to understand its operational benefits, which can hinder adoption. As companies transition to AI-driven operations, a culture of continuous learning and change management is crucial.

Businesses must tailor strategic implementation to their needs and regulatory landscapes to overcome these challenges and promote AI acceptance. Effective phased AI integration allows companies to introduce generative AI tools incrementally, measure results, and make adjustments. This phased approach limits disruption and helps businesses build internal confidence and improve AI applications with real-world feedback. From leadership buy-in to employee participation in AI deployment decisions, stakeholder involvement has helped all parties feel ownership and understanding. In sectors with strict compliance requirements, collaboration with regulatory bodies can boost AI acceptance by reassuring stakeholders that AI deployment is ethical and legal.

Businesses can expect ChatGPT and generative AI to advance automation, data analysis, and customer experience. Businesses must monitor changing technologies, regulations, and workforce dynamics to maximize AI's potential. Organizations must also integrate ethical AI principles like transparency, accountability, and inclusivity to build consumer trust and long-term AI tool acceptance. Businesses may face new opportunities and challenges as generative AI models become more sophisticated and integrated into critical business functions. 

References

AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). Chatgpt as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60-68.

Arman, M., & Lamiyar, U. R. (2023). Exploring the implication of ChatGPT AI for business: Efficiency and challenges. International Journal of Marketing and Digital Creative, 1(2), 64-84.

Aydın, Ö., & Karaarslan, E. (2023). Is ChatGPT leading generative AI? What is beyond expectations?. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, 11(3), 118-134.

Biswas, S. S. (2023). Role of chat gpt in public health. Annals of biomedical engineering, 51(5), 868-869.

Chakraborty, U., Roy, S., & Kumar, S. (2023). Rise of Generative AI and ChatGPT: Understand how Generative AI and ChatGPT are transforming and reshaping the business world (English Edition). BPB Publications.

Chu, M. N. (2023). Assessing the benefits of ChatGPT for business: an empirical study on organizational performance. IEEE Access.

Chuma, E. L., & De Oliveira, G. G. (2023). Generative AI for business decision-making: A case of ChatGPT. Management Science and Business Decisions, 3(1), 5-11.

Cribben, I., & Zeinali, Y. (2023). The benefits and limitations of ChatGPT in business education and research: A focus on management science, operations management and data analytics. Operations Management and Data Analytics (March 29, 2023).

Deike, M. (2024). Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT and Perplexity AI in Business Reference. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 29(2), 125-154.

Diantoro, K., Munthe, E. S., Herwanto, A., Mubarak, R., & Istianingsih, N. (2024). The Role of ChatGPT in Business Information Systems to Support Strategic Decision Making in Medium-Scale Enterprises. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 13(1), 382-389.

George, A. S., & George, A. H. (2023). A review of ChatGPT AI's impact on several business sectors. Partners universal international innovation journal, 1(1), 9-23.

Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., & Kubli, M. (2023). ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(30), e2305016120.

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil transactions on benchmarks, standards and evaluations, 2(4), 100089.

Harahap, M. A. K., Junianto, P., Astutik, W. S., Risdwiyanto, A., & Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in Building Personalisation in Business Services. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(1), 1212-1219.

Huang, K., & Xing, C. (2023). Chatgpt: Inside and impact on business automation. In Beyond AI: ChatGPT, Web3, and the Business Landscape of Tomorrow (pp. 37-65). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Jarco, D., & Sulkowski, L. (2023, June). Is ChatGPT better at business consulting than an experienced human analyst? An experimental comparison of solutions to a strategic business problem. In Forum Scientiae Oeconomia (Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 87-109).

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Singh, R. P. (2023). A study on ChatGPT for Industry 4.0: Background, potentials, challenges, and eventualities. Journal of Economy and Technology, 1, 127-143.

Jusman, I. A., Ausat, A. M. A., & Sumarna, A. (2023). Application of chatgpt in business management and strategic decision making. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(2), 1688-1697.

Kalla, D., Smith, N., Samaah, F., & Kuraku, S. (2023). Study and analysis of chat GPT and its impact on different fields of study. International journal of innovative science and research technology, 8(3).

Kocoń, J., Cichecki, I., Kaszyca, O., Kochanek, M., Szydło, D., Baran, J., ... & Kazienko, P. (2023). ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none. Information Fusion, 99, 101861.

Liu, J., Liu, C., Zhou, P., Lv, R., Zhou, K., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Is chatgpt a good recommender? a preliminary study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10149.

Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., ... & Ge, B. (2023). Summary of chatgpt-related research and perspective towards the future of large language models. Meta-Radiology, 100017.

Nugroho, S., Sitorus, A. T., Habibi, M., Wihardjo, E., & Iswahyudi, M. S. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in improving the efficiency of business communication in management science. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(1), 1482-1491.

Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783.

Raj, R., Singh, A., Kumar, V., & Verma, P. (2023). Analyzing the potential benefits and use cases of ChatGPT as a tool for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of business operations. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(3), 100140.

Rane, N. (2023). Role and challenges of ChatGPT and similar generative artificial intelligence in business management. Available at SSRN 4603227.

Rane, N. L., Desai, P., & Rane, J. (2024a). Acceptance and integration of Artificial intelligence and machine learning in the construction industry: Factors, current trends, and challenges. In Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Industry and Society (pp. 134-155). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981367-4-9_4

Rane, N. L., Desai, P., Rane, J., & Paramesha, M. (2024b). Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for sustainable and resilient supply chain and logistics management. In Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Industry and Society (pp. 156-184). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981367-4-9_5

Rane, N. L., Kaya, O., & Rane, J. (2024c). Advancing industry 4.0, 5.0, and society 5.0 through generative artificial intelligence like ChatGPT. In Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Sustainable Industry 5.0 (pp. 137-161). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981271-8-1_7

Rane, N. L., Kaya, O., & Rane, J. (2024d). Advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning. In Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Sustainable Industry 5.0 (pp. 73-93). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981271-8-1_4

Rane, N. L., Kaya, O., & Rane, J. (2024e). Human-centric artificial intelligence in industry 5.0: Enhancing human interaction and collaborative applications. In Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Sustainable Industry 5.0 (pp. 94-114). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981271-8-1_5

Rane, N. L., Kaya, O., & Rane, J. (2024f). Integrating internet of things, blockchain, and artificial intelligence techniques for intelligent industry solutions. In Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Sustainable Industry 5.0 (pp. 115-136). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981271-8-1_6

Rane, N. L., Mallick, S. K., Kaya, O., & Rane, J. (2024g). Applications of machine learning in healthcare, finance, agriculture, retail, manufacturing, energy, and transportation: A review. In Applied Machine Learning and Deep Learning: Architectures and Techniques (112-131). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981271-4-3_6

Rane, N. L., Mallick, S. K., Kaya, O., & Rane, J. (2024h). Applications of deep learning in healthcare, finance, agriculture, retail, energy, manufacturing, and transportation: A review. In Applied Machine Learning and Deep Learning: Architectures and Techniques (pp. 132-152). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981271-4-3_7

Roumeliotis, K. I., & Tselikas, N. D. (2023). Chatgpt and open-ai models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 15(6), 192.

Sharma, S., & Yadav, R. (2022). Chat GPT–A technological remedy or challenge for education system. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 14(4), 46-51.

Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G., & Moy, L. (2023). ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology, 307(2), e230163.

Shihab, S. R., Sultana, N., & Samad, A. (2023). Revisiting the use of ChatGPT in business and educational fields: possibilities and challenges. BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(3), 534-545.

Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q. L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122-1136.

Yeo, Y. H., Samaan, J. S., Ng, W. H., Ting, P. S., Trivedi, H., Vipani, A., ... & Kuo, A. (2023). Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical and molecular hepatology, 29(3), 721.

Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712.

Zhong, Q., Ding, L., Liu, J., Du, B., & Tao, D. (2023). Can chatgpt understand too? a comparative study on chatgpt and fine-tuned bert. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10198.