Measurement of water potential: Comparative analysis of three distinct methods in biological systems

Authors

Keshawanand Tripathi
Department of Biotechnology, Invertis University, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
Yashdeep Srivastava
Department of Biotechnology, Invertis University, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
Narendra Kumar
School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Institute of Advanced Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Synopsis

In thermodynamics, each component within a system contains a certain amount of free energy that can perform work under constant temperature conditions (Taiz et al., 2015; Tripathi et al., 2013). The process of osmosis involves water movement driven by differences in free energy across a semi-permeable membrane (Salisbury and Ross, 1992). For non-electrolytes, this free energy per mole is called chemical potential (ᴪ). Specifically, for water, it is known as water potential (ᴪw). Osmotic pressure (OP) in a solution arises from the presence of solutes, which lowers the water potential. Thus, osmotic pressure quantifies the reduction in water potential, termed osmotic potential (ᴪs) (Westgate and Boyer 1985; Tripathi et al., 2028; Yadav et al., 2023). Though OP and ᴪs are numerically equal, ᴪs is negative (-). The pressure generated by a fluid is called pressure potential (ᴪp).

Downloads

Published

13 April 2025

How to Cite

Tripathi, K. ., Srivastava, Y. ., & Kumar, N. . (2025). Measurement of water potential: Comparative analysis of three distinct methods in biological systems. In K. . Tripathi, Y. . Srivastava, & N. . Kumar (Eds.), Biotechnology Lab Techniques: Culture Media, Microscopy, and Microbial Analysis (pp. 96-102). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-93-49307-52-0_18