Students Perspective of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName## https://doi.org/10.70593/978-93-7185-270-8

Authors

Muthupandi G. (ed)
Chennai Institute of Technology – Chennai
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8822-0157
Vimal K. (ed)
Mangayarkarasi College of Engineering, Madurai, Tamilnadu
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0798-1086
Arunkumar M. (ed)
Mangayarkarasi College of Engineering, Madurai, Tamilnadu
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5948-3214
Sivakumar G. (ed)
PSN College Of Engineering and Technology, Tirunelveli
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0632-4011

Keywords:

Students, Artificial Intelligence, Education, Higher Education, ChatGPT, Learning, Ethics

Synopsis

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a fast-transforming classroom that is substituting the conventional forms of teaching with the system of adaptation and data-driven teaching. Although the majority of debates revolve around school policies or even the technical design, this book is based on the student perspective of the artificial intelligence tools in education that is solely on the main stakeholders, the students. This edited book is an anthology of studies and thoughts on how contemporary students find their way into, embrace, and question AI in the educational experience.

The chapters discuss the interaction of students with platforms such as intelligent tutoring, recommendation engines and chatbots. It takes a close look at how such issues as the tech-readiness, easy access, and language aspects contribute to the readiness of a student to adopt these tools. Though these applications have potential to enhance individual learning and effectiveness, they produce huge student anxieties. The book directly tackles issues of student anxiety regarding data privacy, bias in algorithms, fairness in automated grading, and the anxiety of being continuously spied upon and monitored by AI.

In sum, this reading can act as a guide to teachers, profile editors, and scholars who attempt to reconcile the needs of technology and the safety of students. It addresses the threats of digital divide, and danger of over-reliance on automation, stating clearly that a human teacher could never have its full substitute. The book states that to demonstrate that AI has a sustainable future in education institutions should construct systems that are not discriminatory, transparent, and vigilant on privacy.

Chapters

References

Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228(4698), 456–462.

Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer.

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278.

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(4), 469–493.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational technology. Springer.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of AI on higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–13.

Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in AI in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599.

Selwyn, N. (2019). What’s the problem with learning analytics? Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 1–4.

Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504.

Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics.

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440.

UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads of AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of AI in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27.

Downloads

Front Pages

Published

2 June 2026
Copyright (c) 2026 Muthupandi G. , Vimal K. , Arunkumar M. , Sivakumar G. ; Nandhakumar R , Vishnu B, Vikram R, Vignesh J

Details about the available publication format: E-Book

E-Book

ISBN-13 (15)

978-93-7185-270-8

Details about the available publication format: Book (Paperback)

Book (Paperback)

ISBN-13 (15)

978-93-7185-285-2

How to Cite

Muthupandi G., Vimal K., Arunkumar M., & Sivakumar G. (Eds.). (2026). Students Perspective of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education. Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-93-7185-270-8
Download Citation