The Human Rights and the Diplomacy of Exception: A Genealogical Critique

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName## https://doi.org/10.70593/978-93-7185-097-1

Authors

Damaraju Pradeep Kumar
K. K. C. College of Law, Puttur, Tirupati District, India

Keywords:

Human Rights, Diplomacy, Exception, Sovereign Exceptions, Warfare, Humanitarian Law, Illegal immigration

Synopsis

It is an exclusive honor to present this timely text, an impressive piece,“The Human Rights and the Diplomacy of Exception: A Genealogical Critique. At a time of worldwide governance in tricky tussles between the power and responsibility, this book provides a sharp enquiry into the historical paths and institution practices that operate as rights are claimed, bargained and sometimes halted. Its philosophical aspiration is equalized with a practitioner and those, who can distinguish between the bets: lives, sovereignties and legitimacy of international orders.
The significance and International Systems.
The volume comes at a point when the world promises in the forms of the international and universal commitments expressed by the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are open to a new criterion. The grammar of obligations has been extended by multilateral instruments, special procedures, and treaty bodies and regional mechanisms; but their functioning has been mediated by state interests, strategic rationales and exceptionalist logic. The author skillfully follows the dynamics between the normative declarations, treaty undertakings and institutional directives and diplomatic practice, and this provides an insight into the circumstances by which normative assertions become protection and in other cases, just aspirational.
Genealogies of Practice
The genealogical approach toward the book is a key strength of the book. The work depicts how the responses to the contemporary setting were generated by the previous, more intricate arrangements of power and professionalism by mapping the lineages of ideology, structuring of the institution and state practices. This historical sensibility throws light on recurrent patterns: the localisation of humanitarian interest, the grammar of protection (which is always bureaucratic), and the discrimination in the operationalisation of values in the diplomatic spaces. The genealogy explains why some populations are attended to and given resources at the expense of having the others taken to administration in limbo.
Imperative of Sovereignty and Diplomatic Imperative.
The conflict between the sovereign prerogatives and transnational obligations runs through the analysis. The book convincingly shows how sovereignty does not just exist as a juridical shell; rather, it is negotiated as a result of a diplomatic give and take as well as normative argument. States invoke powers and need in order to invoke exceptions and conversely international actors use rights-based speech in order to put a limit or to reform practices. The diplomacy that emanates is mostly transactional being dictated by the issue of security, development needs and political affiliations.
Indian Perspective
The work, and its interpretation in particular, resonates especially with the readers in India and South Asia. It places national jurisprudence and national policy decisions in transnational streams, as national discussions of rights, citizenship and migration are reflected and impacted by international discourse. The book wrestles with the governance structures of the region, migratory patterns and political processes, which have an implication on issues of acknowledgement and security. Its repercussions are priceless to the scholars, policymakers and practitioners who would like to make constitutional commitments meet the demands of the outside world to which India is a leading regional player.
Vulnerable Populations, Stateless Persons and Refugees.
Dis displaced and stateless persons are punished and treated with this compassion. The author analyses the influence of the diplomatic bargaining, political considerations and administrative typologies in the realities of these populations. By organizing the documentation, and by critically evaluating the policy practice, the book reveals such failures between normative promises, and material results: protection regimes based on discretionary administrative practices, legal limbos that increase the vulnerability, and political narratives that prefers structural reasons.
Actors and Declarations of an Institution.
The analysis, in addition to the UN and the UDHR, is involved with an array of bodies and instruments -regional commissions, treaty-monitoring bodies, special rapporteurs and civil society networks-which have a combined effect that is known as the architecture of accountability. The book assesses the effectiveness of declarations and soft-law instruments as morally assertive as well as diplomatic instruments, which occasionally spur reform but occasionally serve as a enablement of action or forbearance. This subtle evaluation is useful in helping the readers to figure out where significant change can be planted.
The Human Rights and the Diplomacy of Exception: A Genealogical Critique gives a roadmap as well as an opportunity of critique. It poses pressures on diplomats, jurists and the civil society to consider the genealogies which generate exceptions and question that which the institutions incentivize. The book has convinced me as a practitioner and jurist that lasting change must be achieved by a different form of diplomacy that builds institutional strength and demands accountability, that gives voice to the majority affected, and balances all three elements in pursuing lasting change.
This book is a valuable companion in the complex world of an international order that is marked with contestation. It makes its readers prepared to see the paradoxes of contemporary forms of governance and introduce reforms, which are juridically valid, politically realistic and ethically based. I believe that the Human Rights and the Diplomacy of Exception: A Genealogical Critique will become a point of reference to all of us keen to reform diplomatic practice with the demands of justice and protection.

References

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804764025

Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226009261.001.0001

Agamben, G. (1999). Remnants of Auschwitz: The witness and the archive (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Zone Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrv06

Agamben, G. (2011). The kingdom and the glory: For a theological genealogy of economy and government (L. Chiesa & M. Mandarini, Trans.). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804771535

Agamben, G. (2013). The highest poverty: Monastic rules and form-of-life. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804786744

Agamben, G. (2016). The use of bodies. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804799980

Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt Brace. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838564

Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001

Arendt, H. (1968). Imperialism. Harcourt Brace. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315086484

Balibar, E. (2004). We, the people of Europe? Reflections on transnational citizenship. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825820

Bauman, Z. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251783

Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790799

Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377

Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315882536

Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636313

Chimni, B. S. (2009). The birth of a “discipline”: From refugee to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen051

Chimni, B. S. (2017). International refugee law: A reader. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353886141

Derrida, J. (2001). On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994535

Douzinas, C. (2000). The end of human rights. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095806

Fassin, D. (2011). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520950481

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492580

Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: Volume I: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Pantheon Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315831534

Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245075

Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594180

Goodwin-Gill, G. S., & McAdam, J. (2021). The refugee in international law (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198808565.001.0001

Guild, E. (2009). Security and migration in the 21st century. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315570606

Haddad, E. (2008). The refugee in international society: Between sovereigns. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491290

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283279.001.0001

Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007227

Malkki, L. H. (1995). Purity and exile: Violence, memory, and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190969.001.0001

Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2013). Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822377542

Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia: Human rights in history. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674055186

Nyers, P. (2006). Rethinking refugees: Beyond states of emergency. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964538

Rajaram, P. K., & Grundy-Warr, C. (2007). Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory’s edge. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816649891.001.0001

Rancière, J. (2004). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816628438.001.0001

Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369818

Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty (G. Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738895.001.0001

Schmitt, C. (2008). The concept of the political (G. Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738864.001.0001

Shachar, A. (2009). The birthright lottery: Citizenship and global inequality. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054783

Soguk, N. (1999). States and strangers: Refugees and displacements of statecraft. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816631315.001.0001

Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226768397.001.0001

Ticktin, M. (2011). Casualties of care: Immigration and the politics of humanitarianism in France. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520950535

Turner, B. S. (2006). Vulnerability and human rights. Pennsylvania State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271043326

Walters, W. (2002). Deportation, expulsion, and the international police of aliens. Citizenship Studies, 6(3), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362102022000011612

Weber, L., & Bowling, B. (2008). Valient beggars and global vagabonds: Select, eject, immobilize. Theoretical Criminology, 12(3), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480608090258

Zedner, L. (2005). Securing liberty in the face of terror. Journal of Law and Society, 32(4), 507–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00336.x

Žižek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of the real. Verso. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315024189

Aradau, C., & Van Munster, R. (2007). Governing terrorism through risk. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074299

Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives, 27(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S105

De Genova, N. (2013). Spectacles of migrant “illegality”. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(7), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.783710

Fassin, D., & Pandolfi, M. (2010). Contemporary states of emergency. Zone Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrv2m

Gregory, D. (2004). The colonial present. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755761

Mamdani, M. (2001). When victims become killers. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840786

Nail, T. (2016). Theory of the border. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190618650.001.0001

Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389286

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003096627

Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847488

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300128789

Taylor, D. (2020). Rights in crisis: Human rights in a time of uncertainty. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190096793.001.0001

Torpey, J. (2000). The invention of the passport. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511759024

Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559150

Weheliye, A. G. (2014). Habeas viscus: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and Black feminist theories of the human. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376491

Wendy, B. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8

Young, I. M. (2003). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297556.001.0001

Zembylas, M. (2010). Agamben’s theory of biopower and immigrants/refugees/asylum seekers. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00642.x

Downloads

Book Preview

Published

17 June 2026
Copyright (c) 2026 Damaraju Pradeep Kumar

Details about the available publication format: E-Book

E-Book

ISBN-13 (15)

978-93-7185-097-1

Details about the available publication format: Book (Paperback)

Book (Paperback)

ISBN-13 (15)

978-93-7185-137-4

How to Cite

Kumar, D. P. . (2026). The Human Rights and the Diplomacy of Exception: A Genealogical Critique. Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-93-7185-097-1
Download Citation